Archive for the ‘word usage’ Category

New York Daily News headline uses IT’S where ITS should be.

Friday, August 19th, 2011

An online headline for New York Daily News caught my eye on Tuesday.  Here it is:

Whoops!  IT'S with an apostrophe is always the contraction of IT + IS or IT + HAS.  The copy editor should have corrected to ITS without the apostrophe to show that the 'wealthy economy' belongs to the U.S. (Or so we continue to hope!)  This headline should read as follows:

Fitch Ratings: U. S. and its 'wealthy economy' still AAA.

FOOTNOTE: To the credit of New York Daily News, when I searched for this article again this morning, the headline had been corrected.

My sincere thanks to Michelle Baker for her two guest posts last week, which I'm sure you enjoyed.

 

 

Alabama immigration law will EFFECT business?? Not likely.

Thursday, August 4th, 2011

In the ongoing LinkedIn debate about whether spelling and usage errors matter, a number of people have commented that being correct isn't so important these days. I disagree with that attitude, especially when an error in usage totally distorts the meaning of a sentence, as it does here:

Employers need to have a solid understanding of Alabama's tough new immigration law because lawsuits challenging it aren't likely to strike down the portions that will most directly effect business, a panel of lawyers told concerned business owners and managers Wednesday.

Whoops! When the word EFFECT is used as a verb, as it is in this sentence, it means TO BRING ABOUT.  When EFFECT is used as a noun (as it usually is), it means the RESULT or CONSEQUENCE (noun) that is brought about. I doubt seriously that News staff writer Stan Diel intended to suggest that Alabama's tough new immigration law  would bring about business in the state. On the contrary, as the rest of the sentence suggests, business owners are concerned that the exact opposite will happen!

The writer should have used the verb AFFECT (have an influence on OR bring about change in). His other choice would have been to use the verb HAVE with the noun EFFECT.  The two options for a correct statement are given below:

Employers need to have a solid understanding of Alabama's tough new immigration law because lawsuits challenging it aren't likely to strike down the portions that will most directly affect business, a panel of lawyers told concerned business owners and managers Wednesday.

Employers need to have a solid understanding of Alabama's tough new immigration law because lawsuits challenging it aren't likely to strike down the portions that will  have the most direct effect   on business, a panel of lawyers told concerned business owners and managers Wednesday.

 

 

Hearing aid company ad offers perfect example of bad usage = bad impression.

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011

The heated debate about the importance of good spelling continues on LinkedIn (see previous blog post). When I opened my local newspaper yesterday morning, page 8A carried a perfect example of the kind of poor advertisement that can detract from a company's professional image. Today's ad for Patillo Balance and Hearing Center, a respected business in Birmingham, contains not one but SEVEN spelling and usage errors in ONE ad!  I believe that is a record in my collection, and I cannot imagine how it got past proofreaders at Patillo and at The Birmingham News.  Yoo-hoo, anybody in that capacity on duty? 

 Whoops #1–Although PREFORM is a word, it is not the one needed here.  It should be PERFORM, which is what you would want your hearing aid to do when you want to hear. PREFORM means to shape something ahead of time.

 

Whoops #2–THROUGH is a word, but it is not the one needed here.  You don't want a THROUGH computerized hearing test, you want one that is comprehensive (THOROUGH).

 

Whoops #3 and #4–POWERFULL is simply misspelled.  It should have only one L at the end (POWERFUL), and a quick spell check (if someone had bothered) would have caught that one. The same is true with DESCREET, which is not a word at all.  You want your hearing aid to be DISCREET (not standing out like a sore thumb).

 

Whoops #5–MANUFACTURERS refers to the producers of the hearing aids, so possession should be indicated with an apostrophe.  This coupon entry should read: FREE CLEANING AND INSPECTION OF ANY MANUFACTURER'S HEARING AIDS.

 

Whoops #6 and #7–The word CLEARER is a comparative adjective, as in CLEARER hearing or CLEARER sound.  CLEARER describes a noun.  In this sentence, the writer is referring to the word HEAR, which is a verb.  Therefore, the comparative adverb MORE CLEARLY is needed.  This is followed by the phrase ON THE PHOTO.  I read that three or four times before I figured out that it should have been PHONE, not PHOTO. That sentence should read as follows:

  • Hear more clearly on the phone, in the car, even outside.

Edit of Fifty-four Word Sentence, as Promised

Sunday, July 17th, 2011

None of my readers took me up on the edit challenge for the following lengthy and confusing sentence:

While saying there has been nothing to show where the contaminants came from its plant, Walter coke, the largest company still operating in the area that has had many heavy industrial operations, is voluntarily paying for some soil testing in the area, as well as soil replacement at Hudson K-8 and 23 surrounding properties.

I do not mean to suggest that a 54-word sentence is always incorrect, but this one, with its strings of phrases, is extremely difficult to follow.  First, TO SHOW WHERE is very casual English and adds confusion here.  INDICATE would be a better verb choice than the expression SHOW WHERE.

I think this information is clearer if the sentence is separated into two sentences.  Here is my suggested rewrite:

The area in question has had many heavy industrial operations, but Walter Coke is the largest company still operating there. While saying that nothing indicates the contaminants came from its plant, Walter Coke is voluntarily paying for some soil testing in the area as well as soil replacement at Hudson K-8 and 23 surrounding properties.

 

WEEKEND BONUS GLITCH:Here is a sentence I came across yesterday in a blog post by someone who owns a writing and social media marketing agency:

I write everything under the son.

Hm-mmm. I'm wondering what is underneath this person's son (male child) that could so interesting to write about.  "Everything under the sun (that huge star that shines down on the entire earth)" is the expression this writer is looking for.  I hope he has hired a good proofreader for his business.  The sentence should read this way:

 I write everything under the sun.

Neighborhood LAYS what? LIE and LAY confusion again.

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

Sunday's The Birmingham News carried a front page article about the "parade of onlookers" who continue to stop their cars in a parking lot off U. S. 78 so they can view tornado damage in one of many area neighborhoods.  Fortunately, much of this debris is finally being cleared away.

News staff writer Kent Faulk included this sentence in his coverage:

Five of (the woman's) grandchildren scrambled out of the car to view the Smithfield Estates neighborhood that lays in a shallow valley behind the destroyed business.

Once again, as I've pointed out before, LAY is a verb that takes an object and refers to putting or placing something in a location, as in "The sleepy child LAYS his head on the pillow." or "The men are LAYING carpet in the hallway."

LIE is a verb that means to recline or rest, or be located in a spot, as in "The truth LIES somewhere in her story." or " The largest marble deposit LIES just south of Sylacauga."  It should be the choice for this sentence:

Five of (the woman's) grandchildren scrambled out of the car to view the Smithfield Estates neighborhood that lies in a shallow valley behind the destroyed business.

#5 Getting the Grammar Right recognition goes to RUBES Cartoons.

Saturday, July 2nd, 2011

From time to time, Grammar Glitch Central recognizes companies who "get the grammar right" or point out good usage in their businesses.  Today's "Getting the Grammar Right" recognition goes to RUBES Cartoons for a second cartoon that highlights a common usage issue. This is #5 in our series. Others who have been recognized include Publix grocery stores, the Associated Press, the Blondie cartoon, and Hallmark Cards, Inc.

Leigh Rubin's first cartoon highlighted on this blog had to do with recognizing the difference between LIE and LAY. (See the "Greta the Grammarian" post for June 1, 2011.) Here is the second cartoon:

Rubes® cartoon © 2011 Leigh Rubin-Used with permission (www.rubescartoons.com)

People often confuse DESERT (an arid, sandy location that has little or no vegetation) with DESSERT (the tasty and sweet ending to a meal–think key lime pie or German chocolate cake). Because both DESERT and DESSERT are legal words, your spell checker will not spot this error, so keep your brain in gear!

Thanks again to Leigh Rubin for Getting the Grammar Right. You can enjoy his other work at www.rubescartoons.com.

Eagles LAY eggs, not LAY there looking up at you.

Sunday, June 26th, 2011

A reader sent me a wonderful story yesterday about an eagle that fell out of a tree and was rescued by the Sarvey Wildlife Care Center in the Puget Sound area of Washington State. One of the trainers has a special bond with this eagle, and they each came to encourage the other at difficult times. I loved the story but not the incorrect use of LAY for LIE twice in the story.  Here are the sentences that bothered me:

It was loaded up with shredded newspaper for her to lay in.

I used to sit and talk to her, urging her to live, to fight; and she would lay there looking at me with those big brown eyes.

LAY is a verb that takes an object, as in "The eagle laid eggs in its nest." or "She would like to lay the wreath at his grave."

LIE is a verb that means "to recline or put your feet up." It does not take an object and should have been the verb of choice in these two sentences:

It was loaded up with shredded newspaper for her to lie in.

I used to sit and talk to her, urging her to live, to fight; and she would lie there looking at me with those big brown eyes.

 

If you would like to read more about this eagle and about the wonderful work of the Sarvey Wildlife Center, go to www.sarveywildlife.org.

 


While watching coverage of the US Open last weekend, I heard yet another incorrect use of LAY. Rory McElroy, who won the tournament, was on the 7th hole when one of the announcers began to speculate about how a win in this tournament would skyrocket McElroy's career.  The announcer then asked this question:

What lays ahead for McElroy?

As above, the correct verb choice should have been LIES, which, by the way, Doris Day used correctly in the old song, "Que Sera, Sera" when she sang, "I asked my mother, what LIES ahead" in the movie "The Man Who Knew too Much."  The golf announcer should have said:

What lies ahead for McElroy?

Congratulations to McElroy on his 16 under par win and on being the youngest player to win the US Open since 1923.

LESS people? LESS chances?? Whoops!

Friday, June 24th, 2011

I subscribe to a blog for writers that often includes good information.  Sometimes, however, it contains complaints that are poorly written, like this one:

One hundred years ago there were less writing people in the world. There were less literate people in the world able to write. It is frustrating to know that you are placing your work in a negative and overcrowded environment where you have less chances of success and that you are going to have to spend time doing what a TP (Traditional Publisher) would be doing for you rather than getting on with the book.

 

I have pointed out in several previous posts that there is a usage difference between LESS and FEWER.  FEWER should be used for things that can be counted (like PEOPLE, PEOPLE, and CHANCES).  LESS is used for things that cannot be counted (like LAUNDRY, SALT, or KINDNESS).

Having worked in both the business community and the publishing industry, I can assure would-be authors as well as prospective employees that editors and HR interviewers are often faced with far more manuscripts or applications than they can handle.  When this is the case, their first cut is almost always based on how well written the content of the manuscript or application is.  They can quickly eliminate prospects simply by using good writing as the first criterion.

The paragraph above would not pass muster with most editors, primarily because of the incorrect use of LESS in three different places. The paragraph should read this way:

One hundred years ago there were fewer writing people in the world. There were fewer literate people in the world able to write. It is frustrating to know that you are placing your work in a negative and overcrowded environment where you have fewer chances of success and that you are going to have to spend time doing what a TP (Traditional Publisher) would be doing for you rather than getting on with the book.

Quality writing rises to the top, even in slush piles, so take care with the mechanics of your writing.

 

 

 

What do you have to “loose”?

Thursday, June 9th, 2011

This is a usage Glitch that echoes down the generations no matter how many times it is corrected. While surfing through the responses on a Linked In discussion about the virtues of self publishing, I came across this profound comment:

You have nothing to loose and everything to gain. If you are good, of course.

Self publishing (not Vanity presses) certainly works for some people, but I hope the writer of this comment hires an editor if he plans to go that route. LOOSE is an adjective, meaning "out of confinement." On rare, archaic occasions, it is still used as a verb, as in LOOSE the hounds or LOOSE the dogs of war.

This writer needed the word LOSE, which is a verb and means the opposite of WIN. The sentence should read this way:

 You have nothing to lose and everything to gain. If you are good, of course .

 Keep in mind that your trusty spell checker would not catch this Glitch because both LOSE and LOOSE are words. 

VERSUS waxes poetic (as VERSES) in newsletter article.

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

 Here is a usage Glitch I have not seen before. The sentence appears in a newsletter article about making ethical choices:

There are five main causes of unethical verses ethical choices: pride, power, pressure, pleasure, and priorities.

Whoops! VERSES are lines of poetry or numbered subdivisions of chapters in the Bible. VERSUS is a preposition that sets up an alternative or contrast, which is what the writer needs in this sentence–a contrast between unethical and ethical choices.  The sentence should read this way:

There are five main causes of unethical versus ethical choices: pride, power, pressure, pleasure, and priorities.

PLEASE NOTE that your spelling checker would not catch this error because both VERSUS and VERSES are words.

 

I do like the message of this sentence and the quotation from businessman, author, and philanthropist W. Clement Stone that appears at the end of the article:

Have the courage to say no. Have the courage to face the truth. Do the right thing because it is right. These are the magic keys to living your life with integrity.

What a world this would be if everyone kept these keys on their ring!